Sort order. Jan 17, Keith Akers rated it really liked it. This is a hard book to read and recommend or not recommend , so some explanation is required.
If you a realize that the environmental crisis is really, really serious, "end of civilization" type stuff, and are wrestling with the problem of the social adjustments necessary to deal with the environmental crisis, and b have some background in Marxist thinking, and c find Marx attractive without necessarily buying everything he says, then you will like this book and should definitely read it.
If you don't fulfill either b or c you are going to have problems with this book. You'll probably get bogged down somewhere after page 50, if you make it that far, and give up. I'd suggest looking at chapters 2, 7, and 9, though. I started out somewhat predisposed to give it 3 stars on the basis that the basic idea of the book is good but the rhetoric was off-putting. Then it became clear that you couldn't just breeze through this book, you had to go through paragraph by paragraph, and by the middle of the book I almost put it down.
But I kept reading, and then towards the end of the book the author seems to regain his sense of mission. And if you're a Marxist: please consider this a five-star review, because the main negative in my mind is excessive reliance on Marxist rhetoric.
I was a Trotskyist in my younger days so I am used to this sort of thing. I remember laughing at one of Lenin's titles, "Left Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder," because the title itself seemed "over the top.
This anger had a debilitating effect on the movement. In the end people's anger turned on each other and so you had all these complicated divisions and nothing got done. The premise of this book is that capitalism is the enemy of nature. But here's the first problem: this is something which cannot really be "demonstrated," because it requires a paradigm shift. This is something I wish Kovel had acknowledged in a more straightforward way. Kovel talks about the Bhopal disaster.
If you're really hell-bent on justifying capitalism, this event in itself is not a problem. It's bad, but it's because the people involved were corrupt, the governments' policies lax, and so forth -- not capitalism itself.
What about other capitalist environmental disasters, mountain-top removal, global warming, or peak oil? Well, obviously we have a problem. Major critical reforms are necessary. But is the problem capitalism, or something else? Sure, capitalism is implicated, but isn't socialism implicated too? Did Marx actually say anything about this? Kovel rightly addresses these very questions. He is an advocate of eco-socialism, and he doesn't mean we'll worry about the environment after the revolution.
It's an integral part of his platform, and he dislikes the opportunistic way of approaching this problem that says that "socialism will solve all our problems. The second problem is all the Marxist rhetoric. One of the more intriguing chapters in the book is "critique of actually existing eco-politics.
I have to say that I don't see any place where he specifically refutes something intrinsic to the position of ecological economics. As I understand it, E. So, what does Kovel think? Is this actually good enough to call eco-socialism, regardless of the what Daly et. It's not clear. So I wish Kovel had written a book for people who aren't necessarily Marxists at all. There's a problem with ecological economics as well. They are concerned to show that their ideas are not radical so as to increase its academic respectability.
So they emphasize that they are keeping some aspects of the free market. They have some of the same problems as Kovel: being caught up in rhetoric in their case academic instead of Marxist in trying to communicate their positions.
My take on this is that if you got behind the rhetoric and said, "this is what we need," that it would turn out that ecological economics and Kovel are actually pretty close together. You could make a case that it is, or is not, socialism.
The case for calling it socialism is that all this government control, if actually implemented, is certainly going to look and feel like socialism, even though the free market remains. We need the "eco" part too -- government control, in and of itself, will not solve the problem, and may in fact make the situation worse.
So socialism is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition of dealing with the environmental crisis. Bottom line, and this is why I am giving the book a relatively high recommendation: almost no one else is talking about this. The people who are talking about it, namely ecological economists, also have difficulty with the rhetoric of academic rhetoric, not Marxist rhetoric.
The reason for this is, I think, that this is a difficult subject and we are exploring things for which language is not yet quite adequate. So Kovel is worth reading. They were typically blacksmiths and stoneworkers by profession, unrivalled in some of their arts even by the Elves. While there were several tribes Houses of the Dwarves, the most prominent was that of the Longbeards.
The Seven Fathers awoke in their places in pairs with their wives, though Durin I had awoken alone. The seven different groups of Dwarf-folk originated in the locations where the Seven Fathers of the Dwarves first awoke. The seven clans of the Dwarves were: . Therefore the halls of the Longbeards were not located near the halls of another Dwarf-kingdom. There was also an eighth group of Dwarves that was not a separate member from these seven kindreds, but composed of exiles from each: the Petty-dwarves , who were hunted like animals to the point of extinction by the Elves in the First Age.
The city, populated by the Longbeards or Durin's Folk , grew and prospered continuously through Durin's life which was so long that he was called Durin the Deathless, also a reference to the belief by his people that he would be reincarnated seven times.
The Dwarves of Belegost were the first to forge mail of linked rings, and they also traded weaponry with the Sindar and carved the Thousand Caves of Menegroth for the Elf king Thingol. It is said that some Dwarves in the far East had fallen under the Shadow and were of evil mind when the ancestors of the Edain had encountered them. The Dwarves of Nogrod fought against Melkor as well. A number of retaliatory actions ensued, and the Nogrod army was destroyed by a force of Laiquendi and Ents.
The Dwarves had little participation in most of the important events involving the other races. When Eregion was sacked by Sauron 's forces, the Dwarves assailed them from behind however, it was too late to stop him from conquering all Eriador. When " Annatar " distributed the Rings of Power, he gave seven to Dwarf Lords in order to subdue and control them. However, they did not have the same effect as they did over Men. Dwarves did not shift into the wraith-world and in fact resisted domination.
The Rings only augmented their greed and ability to create riches. At the end of the Age, very few Dwarves participated in the great War , with some joining the side of Sauron. In Third Age , after centuries of greedy digging for mithril and other minerals, the Dwarves woke a Balrog that was sleeping in the deeps of the Misty Mountains since the First Age.
The Dwarves fled Khazad-dum, which from then on was called Moria , which means "Black pit". For more than years the Dwarves of the Grey Mountains prospered until the Dragons in the far North started to gain strength. There, they prospered for over years until the dragon Smaug descended in T. The King and his company went in exile South, while most of the survivors went to the Iron Hills.
Durin's folk settled in Dunland , and in T. Thus began the War of Dwarves and Orcs , in which the Dwarves destroyed all the Goblin strongholds in the Misty Mountains culminating to the great Battle of Azanulbizar where all the dwarven clans united.
The Goblin hosts issuing from Moria were strong and relentless until the arrival of fresh Dwarves of the Iron Hills. The Battle ended with the victory of Dwarves, but at great cost. Saturday 28 September Sunday 29 September Monday 30 September Tuesday 1 October Wednesday 2 October Thursday 3 October Friday 4 October Saturday 5 October Sunday 6 October Monday 7 October Tuesday 8 October Wednesday 9 October Thursday 10 October Friday 11 October Saturday 12 October Sunday 13 October Monday 14 October Tuesday 15 October Wednesday 16 October Thursday 17 October Friday 18 October Saturday 19 October Sunday 20 October Monday 21 October Tuesday 22 October Wednesday 23 October Thursday 24 October Friday 25 October Saturday 26 October Sunday 27 October Monday 28 October Tuesday 29 October Wednesday 30 October Thursday 31 October Friday 1 November Saturday 2 November Sunday 3 November Monday 4 November Tuesday 5 November Wednesday 6 November Thursday 7 November Friday 8 November Saturday 9 November Sunday 10 November Monday 11 November Tuesday 12 November Wednesday 13 November Thursday 14 November Friday 15 November Saturday 16 November Sunday 17 November Monday 18 November Tuesday 19 November Wednesday 20 November Thursday 21 November You are commenting using your Facebook account.
Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Like this: Like Loading Curt said: April 15, at pm. Jan9thxciv said: March 10, at pm. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.
Email required Address never made public. Name required.Oct 11, · Track 2 from the album Enemy Of Silence () Mindlock - Stubborn By Nature YouTube; My Ex Is Too Stubborn To Reach Out - Duration: